The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Identify DSP based system modification requirements
|
|
Work health and safety (WHS)/occupational health and safety (OHS) processes and workplace procedures for a given work area are identified, obtained and applied Completed |
Evidence:
|
Hazards are identified, WHS/OHS risks are assessed, and control measures and workplace procedures are implemented in preparation for work |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Scope of proposed electronic DSP based sub-system is determined from design brief in consultation with relevant person/s |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Design development work is planned to meet scheduled timelines in consultation with persons/s involved on the worksite |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Materials and devices/components required to modify sub-system are determined on compatibility of design specifications with DSP based sub-system requirements and project budget constraints |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Modify DSP based sub-system prototype
|
|
WHS/OHS risk control measures and workplace procedures are followed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Alternative design modifications are considered based on the design brief |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Safety, functional and budget considerations are incorporated in the design |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Prototype devices and circuits are constructed, programmed and tested for compliance with the design brief and regulatory requirements |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Prototype faults are rectified and retested to ensure effective operation of design |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
DSP based system modification is documented for submission to appropriate person/s for approval |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Solutions to unplanned situations are implemented in accordance with workplace policy |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Obtain design approval for electronic DSP based sub-system modification
|
|
DSP based sub-system modification is presented and explained to client representative and/or relevant person/s Completed |
Evidence:
|
Alterations to the design are negotiated with relevant person/s within the constraints of workplace policy, as required |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Final sub-system design is documented and approval obtained from appropriate person/s |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|
Quality of work is monitored against performance agreement and/or workplace or relevant industry standards |
|
Completed |
Evidence:
|